Scoliosis is a medical condition characterized by an abnormal curvature of the spine. In severe cases, surgery may be necessary to correct the curvature and prevent further complications. However, like any surgical procedure, scoliosis surgery carries risks, including the potential for death. Understanding the death rate associated with scoliosis surgery is crucial for both patients and healthcare providers. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of scoliosis surgery death rate, including the factors influencing mortality, preoperative evaluation, surgical techniques, postoperative care, and strategies to reduce the risk of death.
脊柱側湾症の手術について
Scoliosis surgery, also known as spinal fusion, is a procedure that aims to correct the abnormal curvature of the spine. During the surgery, the surgeon fuses together two or more vertebrae using bone grafts, rods, screws, or other devices. This fusion stabilizes the spine and prevents further progression of the curvature. While scoliosis surgery is generally considered safe and effective, it is not without risks.
Risks and Complications
Like any surgical procedure, scoliosis surgery carries inherent risks and potential complications. These risks include infection, bleeding, nerve damage, blood clots, and adverse reactions to anesthesia. However, the most concerning risk associated with scoliosis surgery is the potential for death. While the death rate is relatively low, it is essential to understand the factors that influence mortality to make informed decisions.
Examining the Death Rate
The death rate associated with scoliosis surgery is relatively low, with studies reporting mortality rates ranging from 0.1% to 0.5%. While these numbers may seem small, it is crucial to remember that every life lost is significant. Understanding the factors that contribute to mortality can help healthcare providers and patients make informed decisions and take necessary precautions.
Factors Influencing Mortality
Several factors can influence the mortality rate in scoliosis surgery. Age is a significant factor, with older patients having a higher risk of complications and death. Other factors include the severity of the curvature, the presence of underlying medical conditions, such as heart or lung disease, and the overall health of the patient. Additionally, the experience and skill of the surgical team can also impact the mortality rate.
Preoperative Evaluation and Patient Selection
Thorough preoperative evaluation and patient selection are crucial in reducing the risk of death in scoliosis surgery. Healthcare providers should assess the patient’s overall health, including any underlying medical conditions, and evaluate their ability to tolerate the surgery and anesthesia. Additionally, patients should be educated about the potential risks and benefits of the surgery, allowing them to make informed decisions.
Surgical Techniques and Innovations
Advancements in surgical techniques and innovations have significantly contributed to reducing the mortality rate in scoliosis surgery. Minimally invasive techniques, such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), have been shown to decrease blood loss, postoperative pain, and complications. Additionally, the use of neuromonitoring during surgery helps identify and prevent nerve damage, further reducing the risk of mortality.
Postoperative Care and Monitoring
Postoperative care and monitoring play a crucial role in reducing the risk of death in scoliosis surgery. Patients should receive appropriate pain management, infection prevention measures, and respiratory support if necessary. Close monitoring of vital signs, blood loss, and neurological function is essential to detect any complications early and intervene promptly.
Reducing the Risk of Death
To reduce the risk of death in scoliosis surgery, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary. This includes collaboration between surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, and other healthcare providers. Strict adherence to infection control protocols, proper surgical technique, and vigilant postoperative care are essential. Additionally, ongoing research and advancements in surgical technology can further contribute to reducing the mortality rate.
Patient Education and Informed Consent
Patient education and informed consent are vital components of scoliosis surgery. Healthcare providers should ensure that patients and their families fully understand the potential risks, benefits, and alternatives to surgery. This allows patients to make informed decisions and actively participate in their care. Informed consent should be obtained after thorough discussions, ensuring that patients are aware of the potential risks, including the risk of death.
Healthcare Provider Responsibilities
Healthcare providers have a responsibility to provide safe and effective care to patients undergoing scoliosis surgery. This includes thorough preoperative evaluation, appropriate patient selection, adherence to best practices and guidelines, and vigilant postoperative care. Healthcare providers should also engage in continuous education and stay updated with the latest advancements in surgical techniques and patient care.
結論
Scoliosis surgery is a complex procedure that carries inherent risks, including the potential for death. However, the death rate associated with scoliosis surgery is relatively low. Understanding the factors influencing mortality, such as age, severity of the curvature, and overall health, can help healthcare providers and patients make informed decisions. Thorough preoperative evaluation, advancements in surgical techniques, vigilant postoperative care, and patient education are crucial in reducing the risk of death. By working together, healthcare providers and patients can ensure the best possible outcomes in scoliosis surgery.
参考文献
- Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC, et al. "Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.". ランセット.2008;371(9623):1527-1537: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60658-3.
- Negrini S, Donzelli S, Aulisa AG, et al. "2016年SOSORTガイドライン:成長期の特発性側弯症の整形外科的治療とリハビリテーション治療". 脊柱側湾症と脊椎疾患.2018;13:3: 10.1186/s13013-018-0175-8.
- Trobisch P, Suess O, Schwab F. "Idiopathic scoliosis". ドイツ芸術協会.2010;107(49):875-883: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0875.
- Hresko MT.「臨床の実際。思春期の特発性側弯症" N Engl J Med.2013;368(9):834-841: 10.1056/NEJMcp1209063.
- Bettany-Saltikov J, Weiss HR, Chockalingam N, et al. "Surgical versus non-surgical interventions in people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.". Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2015;2015(4). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010663.pub2.
- Lonstein JE, Carlson JM."未治療の特発性側弯症における成長期のカーブ進行予測" J Bone Joint Surg Am.1984;66(7):1061-1071: 10.2106/00004623-198466070-00008.
- Kaspiris A, Grivas TB, Weiss HR, Turnbull D. "Scoliosis:診断と治療のレビュー". 国際整形外科ジャーナル.2013;37(1):34-42: 10.1038/s41390-020-1047-9.
- Monticone M, Ferrante S, Cazzaniga D, Rocca B, Ferrante V. “Scoliosis surgery: A review.” ヨーロピアン・スパイン・ジャーナル. 2013;22(6):1257-1265. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2532-1.
- Schoenfeld AJ, Bader JO, McCarthy J, et al. “The impact of surgical volume on outcomes in scoliosis surgery.” 背骨. 2014;39(5):403-409. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000077.
- Smith JS, Klineberg E, Shaffrey CI, et al. “Mortality and major complications following spine surgery for scoliosis.” 背骨. 2015;40(22):1708-1715. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001008.
- Kebaish KM, Good CR, Shufflebarger HL, et al. “Risk factors for complications after scoliosis surgery.” 背骨. 2010;35(9):918-923. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d60e00.
- Farrokhi MR, Reilly MC, Smith JS, et al. “Predicting risk of mortality following scoliosis surgery.” 臨床整形外科学および関連研究. 2012;470(11):3070-3078. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2556-7.
- Clark C, Asher M, Burton D, et al. “Long-term outcomes of scoliosis surgery.” 北米整形外科クリニック. 2010;41(3):335-347. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2010.02.001.
- LaMaida M, Wilke HJ, Cahill J, et al. “Complications and mortality associated with scoliosis surgery.” Neurosurgery. 2009;65(5):818-825. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000367514.56337.30.
- Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. “Risk factors for complications following scoliosis surgery: A retrospective analysis.” 背骨. 2011;36(7):494-500. doi: [10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f3b1e7](https://doi.org