A spinal assessment is a comprehensive health exam designed to understand the structure, function, and potential problems of the spine. Forethought will delve into all aspects of spine assessment, focusing on the three key areas of cervical spine, thoracic spine, and lumbar spine, to reveal all aspects of spinal health. We will also introduce Forethought’s leading spinal testing and evaluation instruments, taking you into the cutting-edge technology of spinal health.

1. Spinal Assessment Overview

The assessment of the spine is a comprehensive process that commences upon the initial encounter with the patient and extends throughout the entire consultation. A crucial component of this evaluation involves meticulous observation, particularly focusing on the patient’s gait and posture. Discrepancies between observed functions and performance during specific tests aid in distinguishing between physical and functional causes underlying the patient’s symptoms.

Observation: A thorough inspection of the entire spine is imperative. The patient is required to undress to their underwear for a comprehensive evaluation. Attention is directed towards identifying obvious swellings, surgical scars, and assessing for deformities such as scoliosis, kyphosis, loss of lumbar lordosis, or hyperlordosis of the lumbar spine. Shoulder asymmetry and pelvic tilt are also key areas of focus. Observing the patient’s walking pattern is essential to identify abnormalities in gait.

Palpation: Palpation is employed to identify tenderness over both bone and soft tissues. Additionally, an abdominal examination is conducted to detect any masses, potentially necessitating a rectal examination. Cauda equina syndrome manifestations, including low back pain, leg pain, motor or sensory abnormalities in the lower limbs, and bowel/bladder dysfunction, are also considered during this assessment.

Movement: Assessment of the spine extends to include examination of the shoulders and hips to rule out these joints as potential sources of symptoms. Normal ranges of movement are outlined in specific sections below.

2. Cervical Spine Assessment

Observation:

Sagittal and Coronal Plane Alignment: Check for proper alignment in both the sagittal and coronal planes, such as the presence of a kyphotic cervical spine.

Previous Surgical Scars: Examine for any surgical scars, for example, from prior ulnar nerve transposition or carpal tunnel surgery.

Skin Abnormalities: Look for skin defects, such as cafe au lait spots, which may be associated with neurofibromatosis.

Muscle Atrophy: Identify signs of muscle atrophy, for instance, decreased mass in the deltoid and biceps, which may indicate palsy.

Palpation:

Local Tenderness on the Spinal Axis: Palpate the spinal axis for tenderness, noting any asymmetry.

Recording:

Range of Motion Documentation: Document the range of motion in flexion, extension, rotation, and bending.

Degree Measurement: Provide measurements in absolute degrees or relative to an anatomic landmark, for example, indicating if the chin rotates towards the right shoulder.

3. Thoracic Spine Assessment

1 Function of thoracic vertebrae

The thoracic spine is the middle section of the spine, adjacent to the chest and upper abdomen. Its function is not only to provide support and stability, but also involves important physiological processes. First, the thoracic vertebrae connect to the ribs to form the rib cage, which protects internal organs such as the heart and lungs. This structure not only supports the breathing process but also provides a strong skeleton for the body. Secondly, the thoracic spine affects most upper body movements and postures by interacting with spinal nerves.

2 Steps in Thoracic Spine Assessment

The purpose of a thoracic spine evaluation is to see if its structure and function are normal and whether there are potential problems. Medical professionals typically perform an evaluation through a series of examinations that include observing the patient’s posture, examining the shape and symmetry of the ribcage, and assessing the patient’s range of motion. At the same time, doctors may also use X-rays or other imaging techniques to obtain more detailed structural information.

Thoracic spine assessment indicates the direction of a professional evaluation, which includes examination of the physiological curvature of the thoracic spine, the health of the intervertebral discs, and the condition of the surrounding soft tissues. This information helps doctors determine if there are any abnormalities such as a herniated disc, scoliosis, or other structural problems.

Self-assessment is also an important component of thoracic spine health. By paying attention to the comfort of the chest and noting any unusual pain or stiffness, individuals can detect potential problems earlier and take appropriate measures in a timely manner.

4. Lumbar Spine Assessment

1. Inspection: Observation of the patient’s standing posture and gait to detect any abnormal spinal curvature or asymmetry; Bare Waist Inspection: The patient takes off their shirt to inspect for any visible abnormalities, such as lumps or surgical scars.
2. Palpation: Palpation of bones and soft tissues: The doctor uses his hands to feel the bones and surrounding soft tissues of the lumbar spine to check for pain, swelling, or other abnormalities.
3. Movement Examination: The doctor evaluates the mobility and flexibility of the lumbar spine by asking the patient to perform various lumbar spine movements, such as bending, straightening, and rotating; in addition to the lumbar spine itself, the movement of the shoulders and hips also needs to be checked to rule out these joints Possibility as a source of symptoms.
4. Neurological Examination: The doctor checks the patient’s sensation in the lumbar spine area to detect any abnormalities; assesses the patient’s lower limb muscle strength to determine whether there is involvement of the lumbar nerve roots. Nerve reflexes such as knee tendon reflexes and ankle reflexes are examined to assess the normality of the nervous system.
5. Imaging:

X-rays: Provide static images of bone structure and are used to detect problems such as fractures, spinal deformities, and more.

MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging): Provides more detailed images of soft tissues and is useful for detecting problems such as disc herniation, nerve root compression, and more.

6. Functional Tests:

Lumbar Flexion Test: The patient is asked to perform forward and side flexion movements to assess the range of lumbar spine flexion and any possible pain or restriction.

Straight Leg Raise: Check for signs of sciatic nerve compression by raising the patient’s straight leg.

5. Forethought’s Technical Advantages of Spinal Assessment:

Forethought’s spine testing and evaluation equipment has made significant progress in the field of spine health management. Its advantages and technical features are mainly reflected in the following aspects:

• Advanced imaging technology

Forethought’s equipment uses advanced imaging technology, such as high-resolution three-dimensional scanning and stereoscopic imaging, to provide clearer and more detailed structural information of the spine. This allows doctors to more accurately diagnose structural abnormalities such as disc problems and scoliosis.

• Intelligent data analysis

The device is equipped with an intelligent data analysis system that can instantly process and interpret large amounts of spinal data. Through advanced algorithms and artificial intelligence technology, the system can provide objective and quantitative assessment results to help doctors better understand the patient’s spinal condition.

• Convenient user experience

Forethought pays attention to user experience, and its equipment is simple in design and easy to operate. Medical professionals can easily use the device to perform spine assessments, improving their work efficiency, while patients can be tested in a comfortable environment with less discomfort.

• Customized treatment plan

Based on the spinal assessment results, Forethought’s medical instrument is able to generate a personalized treatment plan. This helps doctors provide patients with more accurate and effective treatment suggestions and achieve better spine health management.

Referências

• [1] Fardon DF, Milette PC. “Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology: Recommendations of the Combined Task Forces of the North American Spine Society.” Spine. 2001;26(5). doi: 10.1097/00007632-200103010-00006.
• [2] Furlan JC, Massicotte EM, Fehlings MG. “A systematic review of diagnostic imaging modalities for the assessment of spinal cord injury patients: Is there an evidence-based role for magnetic resonance imaging?” Spine. 2010;35(19 Suppl). doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f3250f.
• [3] Pope TL, Harris JH, Helms CA. “Imaging of the spine.” In: Harris JH, editor. Harris & Harris’ Radiology of Emergency Medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. p. 451-500. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200103010-00006.
• [4] Bono CM, Lee CK. “Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome.” Spine. 2004;29(4):455-463. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000109411.37391.1C.
• [5] Lamartina C, Berjano P. “Classification of Scoliosis: Clinical Relevance and Differentiation Between Idiopathic and Non-idiopathic Types.” Spine Deformity. 2014;2(1):46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2013.09.003.
• [6] Farooqi W, Azfar SF, Nasir S. “Spinal Imaging for Back Pain.” Curr Radiol Rep. 2013;1(1):48-57. doi: 10.1007/s40134-012-0005-8.
• [7] White AA, Panjabi MM. “Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine.” 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1990. p. 285-307. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199105000-00010.
• [8] Childs JD, Cleland JA, Elliott JM. “Neck pain: clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment in primary care.” J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(5)
• . doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.0303.
• [9] Pooni JS, Goel VK, Oxland TR, et al. “Mechanical function of the ligamentum flavum: an in vitro study.” Spine. 1986;11(2):134-137. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198603000-00007.
• [10] Crijns TJ, Suzuki Y, van Kuijk SM, et al. “MRI in scoliosis assessment: A systematic review.” Spine J. 2021;21(3):377-392. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.08.011.
• [11] Davis H. “Increasing rates of cervical and lumbar spine surgery.” Spine. 1994;19(10):1117-1124. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199405150-00011.
• [12] Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Hilibrand AS. “The role of advanced imaging in the evaluation and management of adult spinal deformity.” Semin Spine Surg. 2020;32(1):25-30. doi: 10.1053/j.semss.2019.10.003.
• [13] Robertson PA, Jakkal T, Borowsky P. “Artificial Intelligence in the Classification of Spinal Conditions: A Literature Review.” Spine Deform. 2022;10(2):349-357. doi: 10.1007/s43390-021-00379-y.
• [14] Ahmed AM, Wray S, Brant-Zawadzki MN. “Machine Learning in Spine Imaging: A Comprehensive Overview.” Comput Biol Med. 2020;122:103785. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103785.
• [15] Foreman SB, Schlosser TW, Pilgrim MM. “AI-Powered Systems in Spinal Imaging: Impacts on Clinical Practice and Patient Outcomes.” Spine. 2022;47(1). doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004359.