For students, a healthy spine not only relates to physical comfort but also directly influences the quality of learning and life. As children and adolescents go through the developmental stages of their spines, scoliosis has become a notable concern. Scoliosis refers to a lateral curvature of the spine from its normal axis, potentially causing various discomforts and health issues.
2. Importance of Scoliosis Testing in Schools
Scoliosis testing in schools aid in the early detection of potential spine issues. During this stage, students’ spines are in a crucial phase of growth and development, and scoliosis problems may gradually progress without causing obvious symptoms. Regular scoliosis checks allow schools to identify issues that might impact students’ futures, providing an opportunity for timely medical intervention.
Scoliosis checks in schools contribute to improving students’ quality of life. Spine problems can not only lead to physical discomfort but also affect posture, mobility, brain function, and learning abilities. Early identification and intervention in scoliosis help alleviate discomfort, improve posture, and enhance overall life quality for students.
These checks act as preventive measures, helping to avoid potential complications arising from spine problems. If left untreated, scoliosis may lead to further structural changes in the spine, potentially affecting the function of other organs. Regular checks enable schools to detect problems early, take measures to prevent progression, and avoid severe consequences.
School scoliosis checks also express comprehensive care for students’ overall health. By focusing on students’ spine health, schools demonstrate a holistic concern for both physical and mental well-being. This care not only addresses existing spine issues but also fosters awareness of personal health, laying the foundation for good lifestyle habits.
3. Implementation of Scoliosis Testing in Schools
The implementation of scoliosis testing in schools is a precise and rapid process designed to ensure that students undergo examinations in a non-invasive and efficient environment. This process requires a professional medical team and close collaboration between schools and parents to ensure the thoroughness and accuracy of the checks.
Schools typically invite a professional medical team, including experienced doctors, nurses, and spine specialists, to conduct scoliosis checks. These professionals possess in-depth medical knowledge and skills to effectively identify spine issues, ensuring the scientific validity and reliability of the checks.
Scoliosis testing in schools usually employ non-invasive methods, primarily relying on simple yet effective technologies such as scoliosis screening tests. During this process, students are asked to maintain a specific standing posture, typically standing upright while balancing the upper and lower body. This helps the medical team obtain accurate images of the spine in the students’ natural state.
Throughout the examination, the medical team utilizes specialized measuring tools and software, such as the Forethought Spine Whale, for quantitative analysis of the spine. This step requires high levels of expertise to ensure measurement accuracy and reliability. The core of the measurement is the calculation of the Cobb angle, reflecting the degree of spinal curvature and usually expressed in degrees.
The implementation of scoliosis checks emphasizes detail and professionalism. The medical team must carefully identify relevant segments of the vertebral body, typically selecting the most prominent curvature for measurement. Ensuring the correct posture of students is crucial to avoiding measurement errors.
During the entire scoliosis test process, effective communication with students and their parents is essential. Explaining the process and purpose of the check in detail, addressing concerns, and providing professional interpretations of the results help establish trust, making the entire examination process smoother.
4. Interpretation and Handling of Scoliosis Test Results
The interpretation of scoliosis test results requires professional healthcare personnel, including doctors, spine specialists, and other relevant professionals. They thoroughly analyze the results, paying particular attention to Cobb angle measurements to understand the degree of spinal curvature. Different Cobb angle values may represent varying degrees of scoliosis, requiring meticulous interpretation.
For spines within the normal range, the medical team typically offers feedback and suggests regular monitoring of spine health. This helps ensure timely attention to potential issues and provides students with good spinal care advice, such as maintaining proper posture and engaging in moderate physical activity.
For students identified with scoliosis issues, the medical team devises personalized intervention plans. These plans may include regular follow-ups, physical therapy, or, in some cases, the use of corrective devices. Personalized intervention aims to alleviate the impact of spine issues on students’ lives and prevent further deterioration.
Effective communication with students and their parents is a crucial aspect. The medical team needs to clearly explain the check results, share identified issues, and provide solutions. This helps build a trusting relationship, enabling students and parents to understand and actively participate in the treatment process. Additionally, providing necessary psychological support is vital, especially for issues that may cause psychological stress to students.
During the implementation of school scoliosis checks, the medical team also needs to establish effective collaboration with the school health office, family doctors, and other relevant parties. This helps integrate spine health into the comprehensive health management system for students, providing more comprehensive and coordinated medical services.
5. How Schools Promote Santé de la colonne vertébrale
Schools can enhance students’ awareness of spine health through spine health education programs. These programs include information on correct sitting, standing, and walking postures, as well as fundamental knowledge about spine health. By imparting proper lifestyle habits and postures, schools can help students prevent spine-related issues.
Schools should encourage students to actively participate in physical exercise. Moderate physical activity helps strengthen the muscles around the spine, improving its support. Schools can organize various sports activities, provide diverse exercise opportunities for students, and guide them in adopting correct movement postures through the guidance of physical education teachers.
Regular school scoliosis tests should be conducted periodically. By establishing fixed cycles for spine health checks, schools can detect potential spine issues early and take appropriate intervention measures. This also helps cultivate students’ awareness of their spine health and instills good lifestyle habits.
School catering environments should also focus on spine health. Providing a diet based on nutritional principles contributes to the healthy development of students’ skeletal systems. Adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D is crucial for maintaining the health of bones and the spine. Schools can implement healthy eating policies, offering foods rich in these nutrients.
Schools should pay attention to students’ learning environments. Providing chairs and desks that adhere to ergonomic principles ensures students can maintain proper sitting postures during learning, helping prevent spine problems. Encouraging students to stretch after prolonged periods of sitting alleviates the burden on the spine.
Schools can establish close partnerships with parents, holding regular parent meetings and sharing spine health information. By establishing effective communication channels between schools and families, schools can collectively care for students’ spine health.
6. Forethought’s Instruments for Scoliosis Testing in Schools
Forethought offers a range of professionally innovative spine examination instruments designed to improve the efficiency and accuracy of school spine health checks, ensuring students receive comprehensive spine care.Forethought’s handheld spine whale examination of scoliosis device serves as a valuable assistant in school spine health checks, thanks to its innovative technological advantages.
Technical Advantages
Innovative Smart Light Sensing Technology: Through advanced smart light sensing technology, the device dynamically captures subtle changes in angular velocity, utilizing MEMS sensors for precise spine detection.
Technologie de balayage précis du terrain : Employing accurate terrain scanning technology, the device collects spine data based on the operator’s movement speed, ensuring optimal terrain data acquisition.
Multi-Level, Multi-Space Information for Accurate Scanning: By utilizing accurate terrain scanning technology, the device gathers information at multiple levels and in various spaces, achieving comprehensive and optimized data processing.
Forethought’s handheld spine whale examination of scoliosis device not only innovates in technology but also prioritizes user experience. Its intuitive design facilitates easy operation for healthcare professionals, swiftly acquiring the required spine data. Moreover, the device minimizes radiation exposure, ensuring safety and comfort for students undergoing checks.
Références
- [1] Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC, et al. "Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis". Lancet. 2008;371(9623):1527-1537. doi : 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60658-3.
- [2] Negrini S, Donzelli S, Aulisa AG, et al. "2016 SOSORT guidelines : Traitement orthopédique et de rééducation de la scoliose idiopathique pendant la croissance." Scoliose et troubles spinaux. 2018;13:3. doi : 10.1186/s13013-018-0175-8.
- [3] Trobisch P, Suess O, Schwab F. "Scoliose idiopathique". Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107(49):875-883. doi : 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0875.
- [4] Hresko MT. "Clinical practice. Idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents". N Engl J Med. 2013;368(9):834-841. doi : 10.1056/NEJMcp1209063.
- [5] Bettany-Saltikov J, Weiss HR, Chockalingam N, et al. "Surgical versus non-surgical interventions in people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis". Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(4). doi : 10.1002/14651858.CD010663.pub2.
- [6] Sanders JO, Browne RH, McConnell SJ, et al. “Maturity assessment and curve progression in girls with idiopathic scoliosis.” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2007;89(1):64-73. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00004.
- [7] Kaspiris A, Grivas TB, Weiss HR, Turnbull D. “Scoliosis: Review of diagnosis and treatment.” International Journal of Orthopaedics. 2013;37(1):34-42. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-1047-9.
- [8] Monticone M, Ambrosini E, Cazzaniga D, et al. “Active self-correction and task-oriented exercises reduce spinal deformity and improve quality of life in subjects with mild adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Results of a randomized controlled trial.” Eur Spine J. 2016;25(10):3118-3127. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4625-4.
- [9] Glassman SD, Berven S, Kostuik J, et al. “Scoliosis Research Society Instrument Validation Study: A Multicenter Assessment of Surgical Outcomes in Idiopathic Scoliosis.” Spine. 2005;30(6):699-702. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000157447.56975.3e.
- [10] Kotwicki T, Negrini S, Grivas TB, et al. "Methodology of evaluation of scoliosis, back deformities and posture" (Méthodologie de l'évaluation de la scoliose, des déformations du dos et de la posture). Scoliosis. 2009;4:26. doi : 10.1186/1748-7161-4-26.
- [11] Berdishevsky H, Lebel VA, Bettany-Saltikov J, et al. “Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises – A comprehensive review of seven major schools.” Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders. 2016;11:20. doi: 10.1186/s13013-016-0076-9.
- [12] Ohrt-Nissen S, Dahl B, Gehrchen M. “Surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2-year postoperative radiographic and clinical outcome in 125 consecutive patients.” European Spine Journal. 2016;25(10):3362-3368. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4541-7.
- [13] Pialasse JP, Simoneau M, Lemay M, et al. “Postural stability and sensorimotor adaptations in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.” Gait & Posture. 2016;50:40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.08.016.
- [14] Negrini S, Hresko TM, O’Brien JP, et al. “Recommendations for research studies on treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: Consensus 2014 between SOSORT and SRS Non-Operative Management Committee.” Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders. 2015;10:8. doi: 10.1186/s13013-015-0032-4.
- [15] Schlosser TPC, van der Heijden GJMG, Versteeg AL, et al. “Scoliosis during pubertal growth: Spontaneous evolution and predictive factors.” European Spine Journal. 2014;23(12):2625-2631. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3594-8.